El Salvador became the first country to classify cryptocurrency as legal tender in June 2021. This decision was made to facilitate transactions for citizens who were unable to secure their own bank accounts. However, the adoption of Bitcoin in El Salvador has faced criticism due to the country’s unstable financial status and vulnerable economy.


El Salvador’s decision to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender has significant implications for the country and its economy. Here’s a detailed look at the situation:


What it means for the country:

Financial Inclusion: Approximately 70% of Salvadorans do not have a bank account. The Bitcoin Law aims to provide these unbanked citizens with access to financial services.

Remittances: More than 20% of El Salvador’s GDP comes from remittances. Bitcoin could potentially increase the efficiency of these international remittances, reducing the fees that Salvadorans pay to send and receive money.

Currency Stability: The law also aims to reduce reliance on the US Dollar and embrace Bitcoin as a neutral store of value for savings.


Implications:

Economic Volatility: Bitcoin is known for its price volatility, which could introduce economic instability.

Regulatory Challenges: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned El Salvador against using Bitcoin as national currency due to macroeconomic, financial, and legal issues.


Current Situation:

As of December 2023, 12% of the local population in El Salvador used Bitcoin at least once to pay for goods and services.

However, a survey conducted in December 2023 showed that the number of Salvadorans using Bitcoin has halved within a year.

El Salvador introduced a new “Freedom Visa” program that allows individuals to get citizenship through $1 million in Bitcoin.


Future Implications:

The future implications of El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law are uncertain and largely depend on how the situation evolves.

If successful, this could set a precedent for other countries to follow. However, if it leads to economic instability, it could serve as a cautionary tale.


sources:

legaljournal.princeton.edu

pwc.com

cryptonews.com

cointelegraph.com

nber.org

bbc.com

tokenist.com

engadget.com

bing.com

data.worldbank.org